wot, no buks?

Plans are afoot for primary school education.

Dave and his Dastardly Crew have decided to shake up what happens in the classroom. Pomes will be learnt by rote, and there will be a standardised list of spellings (i.e. not a list drawn up by the teacher, targetted to the child and areas of study). Not only will the tinies learn about useful things like apostrophes, they’ll learn how to use the subjunctive before they leave primary school. (I love the phrase ‘the idea of subjunctiveness’…)

Dave’s Big Plan is decoding. As I understand it, teachers currently use phonics/ decoding as a tool to help children work out what words sound like. It’s part of learning how to read. It is not ‘learning how to read’.

That’s a much broader issue, based on story telling, a wide variety of picture, reference and other books, real life, finding meaning and pleasure in words. As part of the Big Plan, children won’t have access to materials they can’t decode.

That sounds suspiciously like they want to teach children to learn to read while removing any material that the children might actually want to read. Reading, without books? Why would anybody want to do that? Where’s the inspiration, the fun, the challenge? Where, even, is the chance to see complex grammar at work?

keep these away from children

People who actually know about these things are up in arms. Michael Rosen and other authors have made their concerns clear. The advisory committee are protesting that their issues are being totally ignored. Katyboo tells it well. (Sorry for all the links- I haven’t the energy to provide reasonable summaries. I need that energy for the rage.)

The government think they are the experts in everything. They listen to nobody. They ride roughshod over everyone else (ask anyone with a disability) and presume to tell practioners how to do the jobs for which they are trained and experienced. They’ll keep on doing it.

If only anyone had voted for this coalition government I could blame them, but, no, it’s all down to Dave’s crew. Nobody voted for this nonsense.

Lucky us, having such a bunch of experts in charge of everything.

The summer holidays are upon us. School is over for the rest of the household. Because of ‘quality’ family time/ people fighting over computer access, I’ll be posting less frequently. Cheer quietly.

About these ads

6 thoughts on “wot, no buks?

  1. As a former head teacher, fiona, Pfft! Politicians should not be using education as a football. Nor, furthermore, should they talk out of the wrong end of themselves. The ignorance of these people, who do not know what it is to explore learning for its own glorious sake: context is all. If I ever get in the same room as Dave….I shall not be answerable for my own actions. Wish he had used the banks as a political football instead of our children.

    1. Kate, there was a while when Girl2’s class were in with a chance of winning a national competition- part of the prize was meeting Dave. Girl2 suggested to her teacher that there’d be no point in bringing me along if they won, since I’d not shake Dave’s hand… They didn’t win, so the trauma was avoided!

  2. This sounds like nonsense! There seems to be plenty of that to go around! I don’t understand a bit of why someone thinks this is a good idea! How crazy! Homeschooling sounds better and better! Debra

what do you think?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s